Google Vertex AI / Gemini for Cloud vendor policy review packet for SaaS teams
This page tracks Google Cloud sources for Vertex AI and Gemini for Cloud review. The main review point is whether a team is using standard Vertex AI data processing, an eligible zero data retention path, or a workflow that stores prompts or responses in customer-controlled Google Cloud resources.
Vendor category
Cloud AI platform
Typical use
Vertex AI, Gemini API through Google Cloud, model tuning, embeddings, and Cloud-hosted AI workflows.
Common data involved
Prompts, responses, files, embeddings, tuning data, project metadata, feedback, and Google Cloud logs.
Documents monitored
Vertex AI data governance, zero data retention, Google Cloud DPA, terms, and subprocessors.
Last reviewed
2026-05-21
Review priority
High
Source freshness
5/5 sources have recent review dates
What to monitor
AI and data governance policy
Verified sourceUse the Vertex AI data governance page for training, retention, and customer data handling statements.
Zero data retention
Verified sourceConfirm supported models, endpoints, and feature coverage before promising zero retention.
Google Cloud DPA and terms
Verified sourceTie customer data processing statements to the current Google Cloud contract path.
Subprocessor list
Verified sourceMonitor Google Cloud subprocessors before updating a customer-facing subprocessor exhibit.
Retention and logs
Verified sourceSeparate Google-managed retention from any prompts, outputs, or logs your team stores in Cloud Logging, BigQuery, or application databases.
Review checklist
- Identify whether the system uses Vertex AI, Gemini API through Google Cloud, or Workspace Gemini.
- Confirm whether prompts, outputs, logs, or tuning data are stored in your own Google Cloud resources.
- Check zero data retention eligibility before using that phrase in customer-facing text.
- Review Google Cloud DPA, terms, and subprocessors before updating vendor records.
- Link every training or retention claim to a Google Cloud source and a review date.
Customer commitments that may be affected
- Prompts and responses are not used to train Google models unless a Google source, feature choice, or feedback path says otherwise.
- A zero data retention statement applies only to eligible Vertex AI generative AI requests and settings.
- Google Cloud subprocessors are reviewed before customer subprocessor lists are updated.
- Your own Google Cloud logs or storage do not undermine retention commitments made about the model provider.
- DPA and Trust Center evidence cites Google Cloud sources rather than Google consumer product policies.
Recent changes
No material public change is asserted beyond this source review. Treat 2026-05-21 as the baseline date for future Google Vertex AI page comparisons.
AI Vendor Packet organizes review packet evidence and review prompts. It does not provide legal advice.
Applicability notes by plan or product
- Scope
- Vertex AI and Gemini through Google Cloud
- Applies to
- Product features built on Google Cloud AI services.
- Watch for
- Check model, endpoint, location, logging, tuning, and feedback settings.
- Scope
- Zero data retention
- Applies to
- Supported Vertex AI generative AI requests described by Google.
- Watch for
- Confirm feature eligibility before using zero retention language in customer answers.
- Scope
- Google Workspace Gemini
- Applies to
- Employee productivity use in Workspace.
- Watch for
- Use Workspace-specific sources instead of Vertex AI sources.
| Scope | Applies to | Watch for |
|---|---|---|
| Vertex AI and Gemini through Google Cloud | Product features built on Google Cloud AI services. | Check model, endpoint, location, logging, tuning, and feedback settings. |
| Zero data retention | Supported Vertex AI generative AI requests described by Google. | Confirm feature eligibility before using zero retention language in customer answers. |
| Google Workspace Gemini | Employee productivity use in Workspace. | Use Workspace-specific sources instead of Vertex AI sources. |
Related pages
Use issue pages for narrower customer review questions.
Source freshness
For packet evidence, critical AI and SaaS vendor sources should show a recent reviewed date. Material vendor notices, Trust Center updates, DPA changes, subprocessor notices, and customer-reported changes should be checked before the packet is reused externally.
All listed source dates are recent for the current packet freshness model.
- Recent review date: Sources used in a paid packet should have a visible reviewed date and should be rechecked before they are reused for a new customer answer.
- Urgent-change handling: Material vendor notices, broken source links, DPA updates, subprocessor notices, and customer-reported source changes should be routed to the relevant owner before reuse.
- Stale-source warning: A source older than 60 days, missing a reviewed date, or failing the latest source check should be marked for review before the packet is reused externally.
Source documents
Each factual vendor claim on this page is tied to official source documents reviewed on 2026-05-21.
Scan Google Vertex AI / Gemini for Cloud against your own commitments.
Compare official vendor sources with the customer-facing promises your team has already made. Use the scanner first, then order the $199 review packet when you want the evidence organized for legal, privacy, security, or founder approval.