IndexableDrift trackingLast reviewed 2026-05-21

Vendor commitment drift register

Use this register as the working list for vendor changes that may affect customer promises. It is not a risk score. It is a way to avoid quiet drift.

Who it is for

Teams that need one place to track potential vendor commitment drift from source change to final review outcome.

Template

Commitment drift register with 5 starter rows.

Download formats

Markdown for docs, CSV for spreadsheet review.

When to use it

  • As the main tracker for an AI vendor review packet.
  • When findings come from source changes, customer questions, or internal tool changes.
  • Before closing a vendor review cycle.

How to fill it out

  • Create a row for each commitment that could drift.
  • Keep the source signal separate from the final review decision.
  • Close rows only after customer-facing evidence is updated or explicitly unchanged.

Commitment drift register

Use these rows as a starting point, then replace the example language with your vendor, source, customer data, and owner details.

4 columns
Record
Training statement
Signal to watch
AI data-use or model training source changed.
Commitment affected
Customer data is not used to train provider models.
Next step
Review product scope, settings, and customer wording.
Record
Retention statement
Signal to watch
Retention source, logging setting, or storage workflow changed.
Commitment affected
Customer data is retained only as long as needed.
Next step
Compare vendor retention with internal logs and exports.
Record
Subprocessor statement
Signal to watch
Subprocessor page changed or new integration added.
Commitment affected
Subprocessors are reviewed and disclosed where required.
Next step
Run subprocessor checklist and decide notice path.
Record
DPA statement
Signal to watch
DPA, terms, or agreement path changed.
Commitment affected
Customer data is processed under the right agreement.
Next step
Use DPA worksheet and route wording changes to legal.
Record
Security statement
Signal to watch
Security evidence, product setting, or service scope changed.
Commitment affected
Security controls described to customers remain accurate.
Next step
Update evidence, questionnaire answer, or owner note.

Common mistakes

  • Tracking vendor changes without naming the customer commitment affected.
  • Closing a finding because the vendor changed only a little.
  • Mixing source facts with legal conclusions in the same field.

Example drift record

Microsoft 365 Copilot privacy source reviewed; Trust Center AI policy mentions Microsoft 365 Copilot but not tenant scope; owner assigned to narrow wording and attach source date.

AI Vendor Packet organizes review packet evidence and review workflow support. This template is not legal advice.

Related vendor pages

Use these vendor pages to fill in vendor-specific rows before sharing the template with customers or auditors.

Related templates

These templates pair well when the review leads to a customer-facing update, evidence packet, or internal decision.

Turn this template into a review packet.

Select your vendors, customer commitments, and data categories. AI Vendor Packet turns official-source checks into a review packet your team can keep as evidence.